» List all forums
» » Forum: Piratical Parley and Politics
» » » Thread: GH Policy Regarding Blockade Closures
» » » » Post: Re: GH Policy Regarding Blockade Closures
Print at Mar 31, 2020 9:34:59 AM
|Posted by Filthyjake at Oct 22, 2018 2:43:00 PM|
Re: GH Policy Regarding Blockade Closures
Grief Drop: A drop to annoy the apposing flag
If a flag is seriously blockading they need to deposit a realistic war chest. When was the last time a contested kade cost 125k the war chest for a large.
100 jobbers @ 1k =100,000 poe per seg 500,000 per round. 1,500,000 for 3 rounds.
Most kades pay a minimum of 4-5k per segment. I don't see where a reasonable war chest deters anyone as if they don't understand that its going to cost millions they shouldn't probably drop as they are not serious or have failed to math it out and again are not serious as they failed to think it through the cost of the kade.
Yes, Months from the last offence. It hurts the game and the defending flag a fair amount to prep for nothing but a no-show.
I don't see why a flag should have to defend multiple rounds prior to closing the kade, the Increased war chest was a way to make the Attacker cover the pay that would be bleed from the defender as it is reasonable if increased where as it sits now. 125k isn't enough pay for a brig 20@1k=20k seg 100k a round and they have stock ship moving cost ect.... 25k barely covers the cost of a sloop for one round.
A NO-Show or Un Contested round should not be funded by the defenders expense, as the attackers use this as a bleed. Attacker pays much less then the defender for the one round and increasing it to multiple rounds increases the ability to bleed them.
Filthyjake all oceans (Obsidian Primary)
?Retired? On a Break? I found a new love...
Casual player or yet another who moved on.
Powered by mvnForum
mvnForum copyright © 2002-2006 by MyVietnam.net